Tag Archives: Agile

How to become a Scrum Master

Scrum is a agile framework that helps teams deliver costumer value early and often in a highly predictable manner. Scrum is published in 1995.

The traditional method of the scrum is to allocate the work in a team they hire product managers that handle all the work he allocate the work in team.

The project manager makes a plan for the product like how to proceed and how to finish the work. He identifies the process to allocate to the team first team is BA (Business Analyst) his main role the to know the requirements.

Next is Architecture he is design and figure out the project and make one diagram that will show all the process of the work.

Next we have a Developer who is checking the design and make the estimate time to complete the work. Next he hand over the project to testing team they check the project or software was created is run successfully or not is there any bug in that if the bug found they send back it to the development team.

After completion of this process to project is hand over to the owner.

Scrum is one of the forms of agile methodologies and is also proven to be highly effective for both software development and more general product development.

Scrum is also used in financial product development. Much organisation used Scrum in order to achieve a good result.

Scrum is based on the idea that during a project the customers will almost certainly change their minds about what they want and need.

To address this, a Scrum project moves forward in a series of short iterations each of which delivers an incremental set of improvements to the product.

My advice is to save your training budget by reading books watch videos for scrum that is available on internet YouTube etc.

After that you can able to understand the scrum training process and you will be able to understand the whole process of scrum that will help you to get scrum training easily and get it faster.

Once you’ve understood the basic ideas of Scrum the hard work begins. The hard work is how to implement it on live because applying the techniques is very difficult.

The problems posed by any one game could be one of an almost limitless permutation of possibilities of infinite complexity.

We can understand Scrum as a kind of agile project management strategy that specially focuses on short and highly focused work periods also called as ‘sprints’. Though the sprint backlog is maintained, there are no extra tasks added to the list during this time period.

We can say that the scrum master is the candidate who implements the use of scrum and facilitates working with it effectively and successfully by a team during the course of a project.

It is the principal responsibility of the scrum master to see to that the scrum methodology is implemented in a successful manner without any troubles.

It is a great privilege to be asked to act as the scrum master of a project. From the perspectives of career growth, becoming a member of a scrum team has several wonderful prospects.

The background theory regarding scrum can be gathered from different sources including some articles and books available today on this topic. However, it is a real challenge to know how to put the theory into action. Precisely, this is what the target of the scrum master course is.

During the course, the trainers will expose the candidates to the various essentials of scrum strategies that will make them successful scrum team participants or even scrum masters.

The participants get to learn the basics of the scrum framework, the team roles that form part of scrum strategies, the various activities of the scrum teams, the different roles related to scrum and some artefacts that shall deepen the understanding of the candidates in scrum.

Thus, the outcome is the qualification necessary to make you a successful scrum team leader.

Spread the love

Agile Software and Product Development

In agile software development, solutions provided to the clients evolve by organizing cross functional teams. This provides a conceptual framework that allows changes with time in entire course of software development cycle.

Agile software development also promotes a step by step approach of development that includes adaptive planning, evolutionary development and delivery.

This software development technique is very rapid and flexible that allows changes to the product at each step of development.

In Agile software development, the planning for product development is not for long term but the entire project is divided into several small iterations with minimal planning for each of the iteration.

Each iteration is a period of one to four weeks that consist of all major phases such as requirement analysis, designing, coding and testing, which involves entire development team in it.

This type of division of development into time frames increases the adaptability of the software development cycle to changes by minimising the risk factor too. The entire software can’t be released after first one or two iterations in the market but it allows minimisation of bugs involved in the developed product.

To release a software or inclusion of new features, multiple iterations may be required. In agile software development mainly a cross functional team is required, as it’s the responsibility of the team members to include the required functionality in each step.

In development of software by agile software development, developers follow complete software development life cycle which helps in reducing risks involved in the process of software product development. The time duration for the completion of the software is also drastically decreased by the use of agile approach.

In agile software development, face to face communication is done instead of written document communication with the developers, such communications help in complete understanding of every step.

Agile software development is different from traditional development methods in a way that it doesn’t follow co-operate hierarchy but is cross functional and self-organised.

Traditional software development team comprise of experienced developers and experts and are much flexible according to situations while on the other hand agile technology are more managed and controlled.

There are many benefits of using agile software development technology like the project can be made cost effective, reduction in project risk Psychology Articles, increase in project visibility.

High quality software is developed by the use of agile approach as it provides track and review options for the project during entire development life cycle.

Agile software development approach is very famous among big software developing companies as it allows them to build high quality software in very limited period.

Now a days agile software development has become more famous than traditional software development approach and is employed globally by numerous software development companies.

This technology is basically used in projects where lots of changes may be required during the course of development or many revisions are there.

Best Way to a Create Agile Software Development Infrastructure

These days everyone wants to be agile. In fact, agile is now considered essential for survival in the emerging service-driven economy, and this has stoked fear in big organizations that have invested years, if not decades, in building the monolithic data environments that are anathema to agility.

But even as the enterprise comes to accept the “adapt or perish” mindset that is the first step in digital transformation, it is important to note that agility is not only dependent upon an abstract, cloud-based infrastructure but changes to processes, business models, and the very fabric of the organizational culture.

In terms of software development services, agility actually dates back to mid-century when engineers at IBM and Motorola needed a more efficient and effective means of leveraging these amazing new machines called computers, says AltexSoft CEO Alex Medovoy.

Since then, a number of methodologies have emerged to extend agility from small teams to large-scale organizations, but they all require a significant commitment from management to overcome the inertia that inevitably builds up around long-standing practices. In the end, though, agile development deployed at scale can accelerate innovation by as much as 80 percent.

While agility does not spring from virtual infrastructure on its own, it is fair to say that it is very difficult to achieve within a static, silo-laden data center. This is why organizations should be working overtime to convert key resources, such as storage, to more agile, software-defined architectures, says Shachar Fienblit, CTO of Kaminario.

For starters, organizations should work toward establishing consistent performance across unpredictable workloads, in part by deploying a means to scale capacity and performance independently. Without this, the enterprise must maintain massively over-provisioned infrastructure in order to meet increasingly demanding user requirements.

As well, storage infrastructure must have the ability to incorporate new technologies, like Flash media, without disrupting existing processes.

Agile is also next to impossible without new networking and network management, says William T. Cannon, CEO of Monolith Software. In many cases, organizations are trying to build service-based architectures using systems that were created at the turn of the millennium, before many of today’s services, and even the virtual layer they reside in, were even conceived.

What’s needed is an overarching Service Assurance Manager of Managers (MoM) that provides end-to-end visibility across operational and business support systems by accessing device-level interfaces for both data-centric and virtualized assets. At the same time, it should provide runbook automation capabilities for real-time service assurance and provisioning.

Indeed, don’t underestimate the power of automation in support of agile infrastructure, says IBM’s Osai Osaigbovo. In fact, with infrastructure resources increasingly being provisioned as code, it will be nonsensical not to incorporate this into the agile Dev/Ops model along with everything else needed to support the product.

Not only does it speed up the development and deployment process, it provides for a more consistent service environment across the board, allowing multiple services to work together, even learn from each other, in a coordinated manner. Systems like Chef, Ansible and IBM’s Cloud Orchestrator are only the first step in the transformation, however.

They will need to be supplemented by release orchestration management, plus security and governance tools, to ensure that the automation stack is in tune with evolving processes and workflows.

Creating the agile enterprise is kind of like building the perfect house; there is always room for improvement. This is why most organisations will adopt agility as a never-ending strategy rather than an operational goal.

Agile infrastructure can help the enterprise lay the groundwork for agile development, but meaningful transition relies on more than just technology.

It will take time, effort and, most of all, vision before you start to see successful outcomes, and in the meantime, get ready for a fair amount of griping about how much better things were in the old days.

What IT leaders need to keep in mind, however, is that the old way of managing data and infrastructure is holding the enterprise back, and it is a burden that nimble, service-driven start-ups do not carry.

Priam Business Solutions provides full range of agile software development services Feature Articles, from custom software programming to mobile application design & development.

You can hire our highly qualified developers to extend your team remotely or order a full-cycle custom software development process.

Agile Product Development

Agile Product Development is the new terminology in the software products development technology and it has been using most commonly in worldwide. We are seeing with the evolution of this terminology; it has become the most important part of product development.

Nowadays no any software product development completed without going under the agile process. The concept of agile product development was in existence for a long time but was not an essential part of the development method.

Currently, Agile methodologies of product development are booming and playing a very important role in the software product development cycle.

There is still a lot of confusion on what “agile methodology” is and how it is used in designing and product development. Here I am trying to clear up some of that confusion and little illustration on Agile Product Development.

In the process of agile development, the traditional process of product development goes under the cycle of reprocess, based on its methodology beside continuous deliveries, testing team which manages the cross-testing of all functional activities of developed module and a team which make analysis and plan to deliver a product in a time deadline rather than making specifications.

In short, we can say, Agile is a methodology which is used for the production of software products. We can also illustrate Agile; as – For the proper execution of software creation and programming process, Agile methodologies have been evolved to permit different teams to manage and work together easily until the final delivery of each software products along with all possible changes occur in meantime.

As we observe and see the mechanical engineering product development process frequently faces the problem of inadequacy after the supervision of the engineer that has appointed to supervise workflow of development of the product.

While in mechanical product development when there is a requirement of adding any new feature then at that moment, we can make changes to a product. But in this process, it is hard to track the actual growth of progress after adding any new features at the time of delivery.

As more electronic hardware and software are incorporated into traditional mechanical products, manufacturers are seeking better ways to integrate design activities across engineering disciplines. As a result, many design and development practices are exchanged.

One such initiative, for Agile Product Development, involves the application of agile methodologies to mechanical design Business Management Articles, electrical design and broader product development.

Spread the love

Software Development Methodology

Software development is an art. Because of this art software developers develop quality software. Software development comprises on series of step and each step is atomic step designed towards the perfecting of software. A bug free and time saving software product is the result of true and applicable methodology. The steps involved in the development engineering are long, conceptual and cumbersome. Software production is because of lot of hard work, ideas, experience and testing. Software developers are always struggling to deliver the best by introducing the new versions of software. It is always challenge for the software developers to provide the version of their product that can compete the market.

Software methodology is actual process that is gone through out the development of the software. It comprises a series of steps that are researching, planning, analysing, designing, coding etc. This means that software developers are customising according to needs of their clients. The basic standards that are required for implementation of software methodology are long term experience, industry knowledge and technology to develop software.

Have you ever counted that how fast technology is growing if you compare it with its earlier time? If we go two years back, we will observe exponential progress. Even our life style has changed and now we can complete our task at very rapid speed. Because of technology advancement our social life has improved. Things that were our dream in the past are happening very quickly today.

Whenever we discuss software methodology, it means we are talking about the agile methodology that is very recent introduction in the software industry. The word agile means ability to be quick with technology. It may also have the meaning that it can be more versatile with practice

If we ponder over the market, we will see hundreds of similar software is in the market and selecting accurate one is a tough job. Never compromise on the quality and keep in mind that software is always updated with the arrival of new technology norms , so do future agreement with the company to run your business smoothly.

SAP software modules are fulfilling the requirements of each size industry. Select software modules that are very necessary to run your business. With the deployment of this software, you also need professionals that can run these software modules. If you have already software professional, manage SAP training for them.

Spread the love

Agile vs Waterfall Project Management

We have two popular approaches to complete any project One is Waterfall Models and Another is Agile.

SDLC means Software Development Life Cycle and has many patterns like the waterfall model and the spiral model.

The waterfall is the most popular model in Traditional techniques.

But nowadays Agile techniques are the main reason for quick and quality deliveries.

Scrum is an Agile method. Two are quite different in behavior. Each has its own benefits and drawbacks.

We are going to study the contrast between agile and waterfall methodologies.

Let’s understand in detail:

What is Agile?

It’s an incremental approach to deliver and develop software in a quick manner.

The whole project is divided into small stories.

It is a time-boxed method and frequent deliveries and revisions are very usual.

It is based on communication between the client and the development team.

An agile method is focused on delivery rather than the hierarchy in a team.

Each member of an Agile team has a very important role.

In this process, every story is a bunch of design, development, testing, and deployment.

It breaks the project development into Sprints that are deliverable in two weeks.

The analysis is done after the completion of sprints.

There is no need to project managers, team members can manage the project at their level.

What is the waterfall model?

This a sequential and rigid model.

The whole development process is going through each phase and after the end of the last phase, we get the deliverables.

We can say that part of the project is completely developed.

We need to complete each phase to deliver the product.

We can add changes while development and cant test before completion of the project.

What is good in Agile?

  • It is process-oriented.
  • Continuous communication and self-motivated agile team.
  • Quality is maintained while quick development.
  • It is an incremental process.
  • Very flexible and can easily implement the changes while developing modules.
  • Good for large projects.
  • One of the biggest advantages of the agile model is its great adaptability. Adaptability means ‘responding to change’. Agile is very flexible in dealing with the changes in the customer priorities and needs.
  • Allows to constantly re-prioritize and refine the overall product backlog without affecting the current iteration in which the team is focused on delivering the (Minimum Viable Product) MVP. The changes can be planned for the next iteration, therefore offering an opportunity to bring in the changes within a few weeks only.
  • Agile methodology offers a great degree of stakeholder engagement. The project and the client team meet before, during and after each sprint. As the customer is constantly involved throughout the project or a final result, there are more opportunities for the team to clearly understand the customer’s vision.
  • The working software is delivered early and frequently. This increases the stakeholder’s trust in the team and encourages the team to stay highly committed to the project.
  • This model gives transparency. Both the team and the stakeholders know well about what is happening. The client can see the progress of the work.
  • Fixed schedule sprints of one to four weeks allow for early and predictable delivery. New features are released frequently and quickly in a time-boxed manner.
  • Agile is customer-centric. It does not just deliver the functionality but also focuses on delivering the feature that is of some value to the user. Each user story has business-focused acceptance criteria.
  • Valuable customer feedback is gained early in the project and the changes to the product can be made as required.
  • The focus is on business value. It first delivers what is most important to the client.
  • Improves the quality of deliverables. Unlike waterfall, testing is continuously and frequently done in an agile project and that, in turn, helps in detecting and fixing the issues early.
  • Agile supports TDD (Test Driven Development) approach which provides enough time to create unit tests for the features that are going to be released through MVP.
  • Also, by producing frequent builds, any misalignment with the customer requirements also be detected and fixed early.
  • As we get immediate user feedback after each MVP release, the risk of project failure is low, when you are working in an Agile way.
  • Agile promotes teamwork. There is a great interaction, collaboration, harmony, and enthusiasm among the Agile team members.
  • The schedule and cost estimates of each sprint are communicated to the client prior to the start of the sprint. This improves decision making as the user can understand the cost of each feature and prioritize accordingly.
  • In an agile project, there is room for continuous improvement. Lessons learned from the past sprints can be applied in the next (upcoming) sprints.

What is Bad in Agile?

  • It is only useful for large scale projects.
  • The standups are headed by an expert who can decide the priority and can take decisions on a daily basis.
  • Since its a modular development so a little distraction or misunderstanding can lead the project to off-track easily.
  • It is often seen that Agile teams have a tendency to neglect documentation. This is because the Agile manifesto more focuses on working software than the comprehensive documentation. However, the teams should maintain the right balance between the documentation and code.
  • As it requires a high degree of customer involvement, it can sometimes be problematic for customers who do not have much time and interest to participate in the project.
  • It does not work well if the team is lacking commitment and dedication. Waterfall requires involvement, where Agile requires commitment.
  • · If the initial architecture and design are weak, then frequent refactoring is required.
  • When we compared to the waterfall, Agile is difficult to practice. The team members must be well versed in Agile concepts. It requires a lot of discipline in doing the work and commitment to practice Agile.
  • Due to re-prioritization, it is less predictable than what will be delivered at the end of the sprint.
  • Due to time-boxed delivery and frequent re-prioritization, there are chances for a few features to not get delivered in the allocated timeline. This leads to additional sprints and additional costs. This can also make a problem to the nebulous timelines.
  • Lack of structure when compared to the waterfall, it demands self-discipline, highly proficient and cross-skilled teams. Without this, the project can really be a difficult and challenging one.
  • Availability is less of a blueprint of the final deliverable.
  • Sometimes the external stakeholder cannot resist following the Agile approach. In such cases, the education and the training about Agile are required to a wide audience.

What is good in the waterfall model?

  • Well documented and easily understandable.
  • Easy to map the dependencies.
  • Faster delivery and suitable for small scale projects.
  • Forward & backward planning and implementation is easy.
  • The waterfall model is simple to use and easy to understand. It does not require any special training for project managers or employees. It has an easy learning curve.
  • Being rigid in the nature, it is easy to manage the waterfall cycle. Each phase has a review process and fixed deliverables.
  • Less complexity as the phases does not overlap. Phases are followed one after another. It uses a clear structure when compared to other software development methodologies. The project goes through fixed sequential steps, starting from the requirement gathering and finally lands at maintenance.
  • Due to phased development, discipline is enforced, and timescales can be kept easily.
  • Works well for small projects where we have fixed and crystal-clear requirements.
  • Processes and results are well-documented.
  • Arranging tasks is easy.
  • It is easy to measure the progress as the start and endpoints of each phase are predetermined.
  • There are almost no changes in the requirements throughout the project, hence the tasks remain stable for the developers. Also, it is very easy for any new developer to quickly learn and start the work.
  • There are no financial surprises. Once the requirements are fixed or gather, then the final cost can be calculated before starting the development.
  • Caters for a sequential funding model.
  • Its detailed design makes the final expected outcome very clear to everyone.
  • The functional requirement specification documented in the requirement gathering phase gives enough details to the testers to design the test scenarios and the test cases. Therefore, the testing process becomes easy in the waterfall model.

What is bad in the Waterfall Model?

  • Not good for large projects.
  • Very difficult to adapt changes while development.
  • Only we can move to the next step after completing the previous one. So a very rigid process.
  • As all the requirements must be clearly and known before starting the development, it’s delays the project.
  • Requires extensive research as per the user needs.
  • At the initial phase of the project, it is challenging for the customer is clearly define and conceptualize their requirements in the form of functional specifications. Hence, there is a high possibility for them, to change their minds after seeing the end product. This change can also occur due to a market influence or business plan. Low flexibility in this model makes it very difficult to accommodate any such changes, especially when the product needs to be re-engineered to a large extent.
  • No working model is produced until the later stage during the waterfall lifecycle.
  • Slow delivery times. The customer is not able to see the product until it is fully completed.
  • The customer has no opportunity to get familiar with the system in advance. The waterfall model is more of an internal process and keeps the end-user excluded.
  • The client is not informed well about the health of the project.
  • Deadlines can be missed if strict management and regular monitoring are not kept.
  • There is no room for changes even it is visible during the development as the product is not going to cater to the market requirement.
  • Delays testing until after completion. Also, large revisions is very very costly at this point.
  • High risk and uncertainty are involved in the waterfall model as there is too much room for issues to remain unnoticed until the project comes near to completion.
  • Not a suitable model for long, complex and ongoing projects.
  • It is difficult to measure the progress within each phase.

So we the above study demonstrates Agile vs, Waterfall.

Agile and Waterfall are quite different in approaches and both are the methodology of different times.

Agile is modern and in a trend whereas waterfall methodologies are the most popular techniques to develop a project.

They have their own usability and advantages.

This representation of agile vs waterfall project management will make you understand their importance at their places.

Spread the love